Pay attention? Not now.

-

"Are you listening to me?"

"Sh. Do not disturb me. I'm in process of becoming a better learner. Where was I just now?"


Articles and researches across the printed as well as digital media have identified the virtues of daydreaming particularly in the area of:
self-awareness, creative incubation, improvisation and evaluation, memory consolidation, autobiographical planning, goal-driven thought, future planning, retrieval of deeply personal memories, reflective consideration of the meaning of events and experiences, simulating the perspective of another person, evaluating the implications of self and others' emotional reactions, moral reasoning and reflective compassion [and the list goes on and on and on].

Prior to the long list of virtues of daydreaming, scholars come up with a conclusion that daydreaming is cognitively good and healthy. 


The intriguing fact staggers me as I was brought up and taught in a culture where daydreaming, in classes particularly, is a big NO-NO and is believed to have no positive impact on one's cognitive ability. Accordingly, for long, I upheld the belief that the inability to be present and think about concerns unrelated to what one is doing (or daydreaming) is a cognitive waste of time and reveals one's lack of mental control and ability.

Hence, as a student, I tried my best to not daydreaming and, as a teacher, I cajoled my students not to daydream. Yet through Susanne Gargiulo, I discover that the decision of not allowing time to get one's mind away is limiting one's chances for making insights as the AHA moment does not come from a directed and particular focus on a task (this might also explain the reason why best ideas come from the loo as people do daydream a lot in the loo compared to elsewhere; the loof-aha moment).



Having insights into the virtues of daydreaming and having known that my previous belief is a fallacy are both surprising and interesting. After having daydream about daydreaming, many questions begin to creep in my head. Three of the most important are:
Should I scrap the belief that daydreaming is very disruptive especially in driving students to accomplish primary task?

Should I let my students to daydream in class just because I believe it is cognitively healthy for them? 

Should I encourage everyone in the class to be an absent-minded as a research says an absent-minded child might actually have sharper brains?

Should I? or Should I not?

Scholars reveal that daydreaming allows mind to wander and reflect things that are unresolved. By giving students freedom to daydream, they are able to have deep insights into their current situations, problems, personal growth and so on. Indeed, daydreaming is a rewarding activity yet, it is essential to bear in mind that the key element to effectively work with wandering mind (or daydreaming) is to keep unimportant clutter so your mind can wander to unresolved things that are important. 

That is the real challenge for our students. If teachers allow them to daydream in lessons, will their mind wander on important unresolved problems? or will their mind just wander on who should be their next lover in line and the texts that they should send to impress?

Sigh -_-"

Comments

Post a Comment

You say:

Popular posts from this blog

Parking Lot

-
Image
Parking Lot has been considered as one of the best practices in the 21st century classrooms besides the famous group seating arrangement. In Malaysian public schools especially in Sekolah Amanah, it is a mandatory  to prepare a space or an area in the class to put up a Parking Lot. Per contra , to date, teachers are having a lack of proper guidance on the use of Parking Lot as a consequence of  the non-existence of a blueprint or a printed guide from any Malaysian education departments on this practice . Worst, the knowledge of Parking Lot is succinctly dismantle to teachers while they are having courses on 21st century classroom or learning, during Professional Learning Communities (PLC) sessions or during department meetings. It is through these short sessions or meet-ups that Malaysian teachers are made aware of the benefits of Parking Lot. Even the practice could benefit both teacher and students, the lack of understanding on the practice  results failure in its execu
Read more

Use Malay (L1) instead of English (L2) in English Lessons?

-
Image
The debate on the use of L1 in L2 lessons has been going on since forever. Different scholars come out with different theories and hypotheses yet no one theory or hypothesis has become the most significant. After all, it all depends on the teaching context. The use of L1 has always been a contentious issue. Teachers have choices whether to: ban L1; minimise L1; or maximise L2. Again, it all depends on the context the teachers are in. It is best to also mention that even so, teachers who resort to the L1, despite their best intentions, often feel guilty for straying from L2 path (Cook, 2001). However now, let's not talk about teacher's use of L1.  Let's look at student's use of L1 in L2 lessons.  Should we ban the use of L1 among students in L2 lessons? If not, why are there a lot of suggestions given to cut or limit the use of L1 in L2 lessons? I remember when I once made it a rule that students should only talk to me
Read more

Nadia Anjuman

-
Image
What should I do with a broken wing Which does not let me fly? I have been silent too long, But I never forget the melody. Since every moment I whisper, The song from my heart. Reminding myself of the day, I will break free of this cage. By from this solitude, And sing with abandon. I am not a weak tree, To be shaken by any wind. I am an Afghan woman, It only makes sense to cry. Nadia Anjuman was a talented Afghani poet who was beaten to death by her husband at the age of 25.  Al-Fatihah.
Read more